Sports

Voice to Parliament is ‘a bad idea’: Credlin


Sky News host Peta Credlin says the Coalition needs to oppose the government’s intention to hold a referendum for the formation of an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

“It's a bad idea, and the sooner the Coalition opposes it in principle the better,” Ms Credlin said.

No Liberal Party worthy of the name should need to wait for any detail to declare that a race-based body – on any level – is okay."

She listed the three “massive problems” with enshrining a voice in the Constitution prior to knowing “exactly what the voice should be”.

“First, simply enshrining a national body or voice could invite court challenges as to its adequacy," she said. 

“Second, the Commonwealth already has powers to do this under section 51(xxvi) – as the establishment of ATSIC by the Hawke government demonstrates.

“And third, any proposal that effectively gives the government a blank cheque is asking for trouble.”

Ms Credlin said establishing the Voice to Parliament “would mean creating a race-based electoral roll, to establish a race-based body, to consider laws on the basis of their impact on just one race alone”.

“How is this not a form of racism, of dividing people by race, even if it's what lots of Aboriginal activists want us to do?"

Sky News host Peta Credlin says the Coalition needs to oppose the government’s intention to hold a referendum for the formation of an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

“It’s a bad idea, and the sooner the Coalition opposes it in principle the better,” Ms Credlin said.

No Liberal Party worthy of the name should need to wait for any detail to declare that a race-based body – on any level – is okay.”

She listed the three “massive problems” with enshrining a voice in the Constitution prior to knowing “exactly what the voice should be”.

“First, simply enshrining a national body or voice could invite court challenges as to its adequacy,” she said.

“Second, the Commonwealth already has powers to do this under section 51(xxvi) – as the establishment of ATSIC by the Hawke government demonstrates.

“And third, any proposal that effectively gives the government a blank cheque is asking for trouble.”

Ms Credlin said establishing the Voice to Parliament “would mean creating a race-based electoral roll, to establish a race-based body, to consider laws on the basis of their impact on just one race alone”.

“How is this not a form of racism, of dividing people by race, even if it’s what lots of Aboriginal activists want us to do?”
Sky News host Peta Credlin says the Coalition needs to oppose the government’s intention to hold a referendum for the formation of an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

“It’s a bad idea, and the sooner the Coalition opposes it in principle the better,” Ms Credlin said.

No Liberal Party worthy of the name should need to wait for any detail to declare that a race-based body – on any level – is okay.”

She listed the three “massive problems” with enshrining a voice in the Constitution prior to knowing “exactly what the voice should be”.

“First, simply enshrining a national body or voice could invite court challenges as to its adequacy,” she said.

“Second, the Commonwealth already has powers to do this under section 51(xxvi) – as the establishment of ATSIC by the Hawke government demonstrates.

“And third, any proposal that effectively gives the government a blank cheque is asking for trouble.”

Ms Credlin said establishing the Voice to Parliament “would mean creating a race-based electoral roll, to establish a race-based body, to consider laws on the basis of their impact on just one race alone”.

“How is this not a form of racism, of dividing people by race, even if it’s what lots of Aboriginal activists want us to do?”

Read Next



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.