Melbourne champion Garry Lyon says the AFL has hit a “crisis” on umpire dissent interpretation, whereas AFL 360 Gerard Whateley believes the league has already “lost control” of the problem by Round 5.
The respect-for-umpires challenge roared again to life all through the AFL’s most up-to-date residence and away spherical. Lions star Harris Andrews on Thursday, adopted by two Hawks on Monday, copped 50m penalties for placing their arms out when questioning an umpire’s choice, regardless of a number of different incidents in between the 2 video games going unpunished.
The AFL in February wrote to golf equipment and burdened the significance for respect in direction of umpires in any respect ranges of the sport. It was revealed there was a 6000-umpire scarcity at neighborhood soccer degree, with AFL government normal supervisor Andrew Dillon saying it was essential to “set the right example at the elite level so we can encourage and retain umpires across the country to best support the rapidly growing player participation base”.
Stream each match of each spherical of the 2022 Toyota AFL Premiership Season Live & Ad-Break Free In-Play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Try 14-Days Free Now >
But Herald Sun journalist Jon Ralph reported on Monday night time the league had “slipped” when penalising participant behaviour in direction of umpires between Rounds 2 and 4, therefore the mass confusion throughout Round 5.
After Andrews gave away the 50m penalty on Thursday night time, a number of ‘arms out’ circumstances weren’t penalised throughout different Round 5 video games, notably the Suns-Saints and Blues-Power matches – as identified on Fox Footy’s On The Couch.
Lyon mentioned the interpretation wanted “a total overhaul”.
“This dissent issue … what we’ve seen over the course of this weekend suggests that there’s a crisis that (AFL football manager) Brad Scott’s got to sort out – and he should sort out (Tuesday) morning otherwise it’s disgrace what we’ve seen over the weekend,” Lyon instructed Fox Footy’s On The Couch.
“We’re sitting here at Fox Footy and I counted up about 1800 games of experience and I went around and asked everyone and they all had steam coming out of their ears. There is a crisis.
“I thought it was a fantastic initiative and I still do. I maintain that it needed to be done, I think it was out of control and the players turned into half idiots.
“They took a really hard stance early and now we’re in a situation five rounds in and this is what frustrates supporters, it frustrates commentators, it frustrates players even more when no one really knows what is going on in terms of umpire dissension.
“If they’re saying this (arms out) is a sign of dissension, pay it – because you can’t have a competition where you go ‘hang on … I heard that bloke in the green say ‘that’s a free kick’ then saw 15 instances and no one paid it.
“Brad needs to speak really strongly (on Tuesday) and if this is it, then this is it – because right now it’s embarrassing that our professional competition is run like this.”
After talking with the AFL, Ralph reported Andrews was accurately penalised, however mentioned a number of different gamers – together with Carlton’s George Hewett – have been incorrectly allowed to place his arms out
“The message from AFL house could not be stronger that if a player puts their arms out in a demonstrative fashion, that will be 50m. If a player is not penalised, the AFL umpires will be told you should penalise that player,” Ralph instructed On The Couch.
“Brad Scott will be speaking to the umpires. It gets back to what the AFL is calling ‘slippage’ – which you or I are calling massive inconsistency. The AFL has conceded today there was some ‘slippage’ from Rounds 2 to 4.
“The AFL is saying that they’re getting reports back from senior coaches, who go to community football and country football – and there is a greater level of respect between our umpires and players. That’s why it’s worth it, so the umpires need to nail the execution.
“The AFL would say it’s always been the rule (since the pre-season interpretation change). I think the better argument is to say can it stand up in the heat of battle? It clearly couldn’t today when Tom Hawkins dived forward – in something he will be fined for – and the players naturally just said ‘that’s not a free kick’.”
Speaking on Fox Footy’s AFL 360, Whateley pointed to the six-point ‘Free Kicks – Umpires’ legislation, which incorporates when a participant ‘disputes a decision of an umpire’ – and the way exhausting that’s been to interpret.
“I think it would be a reasonable observation to say that the AFL has lost control of this by Round 5,” he mentioned.
“No one would be prescriptive enough (about the free kick rules). There was no specificity, ‘this is what dissent looks like and this is what we are going to stamp out’.
“We got a little look in that first weekend of pre-season, footy and everything got paid. Then that didn’t translate in the season proper.
“It is possible to achieve this as an outcome but only if the entire industry, the entire sport is in on it – and particularly, the players, ‘this is no longer what we want, we won’t tolerate the flapping of arms’.”
Herald Sun chief soccer author Mark Robinson mentioned ‘arms out’ in direction of an umpire shouldn’t represent dissent.
“That (arms out) is not dissent, that is frustration,” he instructed AFL 360.
“This is disgraceful. This is the worst comment I’ve ever heard an umpire make in my time in football – even before my time because I’ve watched a lot of TV and football: ‘Arm’s out, 50m.’
“Just put 18 robots out there. This game has been stripped of personality. This game has been stripped of emotion. This game is all of that.
“Year after year, we are stripping away parts of the game that made the game great – and I’m not talking about violence.”
Triple premiership Lion Jonathan Brown mentioned the crackdown was wanted however added it was by no means going to immediate rapid change.
“This has been ingrained in our behaviour culturally for a long time, so I don’t think the AFL would think it’s going to change in five weeks,” he instructed On The Couch.
“Obviously they want to get to gold standard … but it’ll take some time.”