Tony Yengeni weapons for Chief Justice Zondo over state seize findings

Convicted fraudster and ANC NEC member Tony Yengeni filed a grievance with the Judicial Service Commission towards Chief Justice Raymond Zondo over a number of the findings within the newest quantity of the report on state seize.

In courtroom papers seen by The Citizen, Yengeni – who filed the grievance in his private capability – argues that Zondo breached the judicial code of conduct when he made findings which had political implications.

Yengeni’s arguing that Zondo’s feedback on the 2017 ANC elective convention the place Ramaphosa was elected had basically saved the nation from additional harm was venturing into the political enviornment.

“First and foremost, I’m not conscious which witness(es) offered the testimony on the idea of which this political discovering is made.

Even if such testimony was offered, such a discovering is unjustified if such testimony was by no means examined by
manner of cross-examination,” stated Yengeni within the grievance.

“It is therefore inappropriate for a judicial officer to make such a subjective finding without real evidence.”

Yengeni says Zondo’s discovering was subjective and displayed a “foray into intra-party politics” which, he believes, is a gross violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

He additionally stated the discovering “quite dangerously may have the effect of fanning factional fires within the governing party”, and affect delegates’ political voting patterns on the elective convention in December 2022.

“This conduct, I submit, is in breach of the next provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct:

  • A choose should not until it’s mandatory for the discharge of judicial workplace, turn into concerned in any political controversy or exercise.
  • A choose should not use or lend the status of the judicial workplace to advance the personal pursuits of the choose or others”.

Yengeni goes on to say Zondo made the findings in his capability as Commission Chairperson, not as a choose, and due to this fact has no authorized binding.

“In other words, his/her role is not to render judgment which has legal and binding effect after hearing evidence. His/her role is rather to make recommendations to the president, which the president is free to accept or reject.”

Yengeni accused Zondo of advancing Ramaphosa’s pursuits within the ANC’s upcoming elective convention, the place the president is up for a second time period.

He additionally argued Zondo’s assertion that Ramaphosa’s election “saved the country from further damage,” was “puzzling” as a result of South Africa’s prospects had not improved since Ramaphosa’s ascension to the highest publish.

“South Africans are worse off at this time than they have been earlier than the election of the present president of the African National Congress.

“The unemployment rate has increased markedly; South Africans are facing unprecedented incidents of power outages, causing massive (preventable) losses to businesses and avoidable inconvenience to ordinary citizens”.

“It is estimated that stage 4 load shedding costs the South African economy up to R1 billion a day.”

This will not be the primary time Yengeni expressed disapproval of Zondo.

In January, Yengeni slammed Zondo for responding to a controversial op-ed by Tourism Minister Lindiwe Sisulu, through which she launched a scathing assault on the judiciary.

Sisulu attacked the Constitution and black judges specifically describing them as “mentally colonised”.

It is vital to notice that Sisulu has additionally thrown her hat within the ring for the highest job.

During an interview with Talk Radio 702, Yengeni known as on the nation’s judges to “grow up” and cease being “cry babies”.

NOW READ: NPA wants R750 million to answer the Zondo fee

Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.