The AFL’s crackdown on umpire dissent continues to confound followers after one other controversial incident in Monday afternoon’s conflict between Hawthorn and Geelong.
Players have been warned of the crackdown earlier than the beginning of this season, though its inconsistent software and lack of frequent sense has seen the interpretation come underneath scrutiny.
That will solely proceed after Monday’s drama, with Garry Lyon calling for a “total overhaul” and it was not the one controversial name to come back underneath the microscope.
Stream each match of each spherical of the 2022 Toyota AFL Premiership Season Live & Ad-Break Free In-Play on Kayo. New to Kayo? Try 14-Days Free Now >
Only moments prior, Tom Hawkins kicked Geelong out to an eight-point lead after a doubtful free kick was awarded for being blocked by Sam Frost.
Replays although would present Hawkins showing to dive within the course of, only one spherical after he was not penalised for a push within the again in a one-on-one contest with Harris Andrews.
As The Herald Sun’s Jon Ralph later tweeted, Hawks is taking a look at a effective for “excessive exaggeration”, consistent with the AFL’s staging guidelines.
Frost might be overheard on the umpire microphone arguing: “He’s 115 kilograms” and he had the assist of Geelong’s premiership-winning skipper Cameron Ling.
“There’s not a lot defender can do there,” Ling mentioned.
“Sam Frost is playing on one of best key forwards in the game. One of the biggest and strongest players to play the game. He was taking his body. You have to do that as a defender.
There’s nothing else Frost could have done there. That should have been a [Changkuoth] Jiath mark.”
But the drama was removed from over, with Tom Mitchell and Jack Gunston pinged for dissenting from the umpire after gesturing in direction of the scoreboard as replays of the incident have been proven.
“Both Tommy Mitchell and Jack Gunston look at the replay and they both put their hands up and the umpire’s paid 50 metres because they are both talking to the umpire,” four-time premiership Hawk Luke Hodge mentioned in commentary.
“You can see clearly the players are frustrated and unsure. Yes they’re being told, but it seemed to be softened off from Round 1 to now and then it’s just bee, back on the agenda.”
Hawthorn’s James Sicily admitted to as a lot in a post-game interview with Fox Footy, conceding he’s not completely clear on the rule’s interpretation.
“It’s a difficult one,” he mentioned.
“I feel like if it’s not demonstrative, sometimes it’s just a reflex because it’s been that way for so long. But I suppose that’s why they are trying to implement it and we’ve got to try respect it as much as possible. It definitely is hard when the games are tight and emotions are high.
“To be honest, I’m not clear on it. I just try keep my hands to myself and just stand there.”
It left some pundits calling for frequent sense within the ruling, arguing that whereas it is very important respect umpires, incidents equivalent to Monday’s aren’t worthy of being deemed as dissent.
Making the choice extra irritating although for some was the truth that Carlton’s George Hewett was not penalised for placing his “arms out” within the dying levels of its sport with Port Adelaide.
The Herald Sun’s Ralph had beforehand reported that the AFL is backing umpires within the crackdown however talking on Fox Footy throughout Good Friday, Melbourne nice Garry Lyon known as for consistency.
“The zero tolerance I‘m absolutely supportive of in round one on this dissension. It went from zero tolerance to five per cent then to about 15 per cent and now they go back to zero tolerance,” he said.
“That‘s why players and fans get annoyed. If you keep it at zero tolerance, Harris Andrews doesn’t go there.
“But he says ‘hang on the last three weeks I’ve been watching it slowly, slowly, slowly coming again’.
“That’s why they get annoyed.”
He was not the one one too, with the crackdown and earlier free kick a controversial subject on social media.